Tags primitive compounds for OpenSCAD, partial hollow, ,, Download. Python 3.10.8, Qt 5.15.4, Coin 4.0.0, Vtk 9.1.0, OCC 7.6.3Īlso with Alternative importer not seeing the problem Click to find the best Results for hollow cylinder by Models for your 3D Printer. Tonight is Winchester Photography Society meeting, so I will leave now and look again tomorrow. Looking at the first step file test.step the problem is there, so whatever I did, the problem is there, after that all the other step files 2-8 I am not seeing the problem.Ĭould try with importing a scad file, Alternate Importer, all there import options. Just be prepared for simple parts to take hours to render and run your system out of memory.Thought I was able to reproduce the problem when I initially tried with Add Elements but then I tried importing as a scad file and now when I try I am not seeing the problem. Using similar tricks, you can get whatever automatic fillets or chamfers you want. Slow as balls, and the accuracy depends a lot on the number of vertices you give your sphere (which affects the speed), but it works. Finally, take E and run minkowksi again with sphere of radius R to return your part to the original size, but with rounded corners. A-D gives E, which is your original part, but slightly smaller. ![]() This example makes an object hollow with a specified wall thickness, // and cuts away the lower half (Z<0). Now take C and do minkowksi with another sphere of some radius R you're interested in (D). I found a solution, but it's extremely slow because it uses minkowski. ![]() You've effectively created a surface from your object. Subtract A from B to provide C, a hollow shell marginally larger than your original. Then take minkowksi with small sphere (B). I use it professionally, however.īasically, I abuse minkowksi and a really tiny sphere to fake it. I created my own, slow, imperfect functions for that in openscad. And, yes, I know reimporting back into OpenSCAD is worrisome with the huge point clouds instead if the original Script used to create the object. Since adding Fillets and Chamfers is generally best done last, well, in FreeCAD it is, it seems like a no-brainer to export to CSG and clean up in FreeCAD. I was able to instantly add Fillets and Chamfers.ĭoing some searching here and generally on-line I kept finding a lot of whining about the Fillet/Chamfer issues, but not a single mention of FreeCAD and the CSG format. By carefully editing the code, I can even make a new hollow cylinder go. Opened FreeCAD and viola, in came the bearing. But in addition, I want to experiment with OpenSCAD - so I will find a way to. ![]() I hastily threw together a bearing in OpenSCAD and Exported it to "bearing.csg" I am lazy so the less I have to do when the print has finished, the better.Ĭhecking through FreeCAD (which generally sucks because it is so buggy) but does Fillets and Chamfers like a whiz, I saw "Open OpenSCAD. But, using OpenSCAD for developing 3D prints, Fillets and Chamfers are mandatory unless you like a lot of hand-cleaning up after printing. Yes, I know about the libraries and Manowiz rounding, or whatever it is. As newbie to OpenSCAD I have been alarmed at the lack of simple Fillets and Chamfers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |